Smt. V. Sumathi, v. Smt. Bandaru Kusuma,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL A.S.M.P.No.572 of 2017 and A.S.No.165 of 2014 JUDGMENT:

The 2nd respondent in the petition, who has since become major, is present along with the appellants, who are the defendants in O.S.No.80 of 2011 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti.

The 2nd respondent along with her deceased mother filed suit for declaration of possession and recovery of suit schedule property. The said suit was decreed and hence, the defendants preferred the present appeal.

During pendency of the appeal, both parties filed A.S.M.P.No.572 of 2017, stating that they have entered into compromise out of court amicably and prayed for recording of compromise and dispose of the appeal in terms of the compromise. The 2nd respondent/plaintiff has executed two registered instruments in favour of the appellants/defendants in respect of the suit schedule property, which are filed along with the compromise petition.

The appellants/defendants and their counsel are present. The 2nd respondent/plaintiff and her counsel are also present.

Heard both sides and perused the record.

Both parties have admitted the contents, terms and conditions of the compromise, and in proof thereof, affixed their signatures on the compromise petition in open court. In that view of the matter, A.S.M.P.No.572 of 2017 is allowed and the compromise is recorded. Consequently, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed in consequence.

____________________ M.S.K. JAISWAL, J March 15, 2017 Pn

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL A.S.M.P.No.572 of 2017 & A.S.No.165 of 2014 March 15, 2017 Pn