Smt.Nandyala Sujatha v. Sri. Nandyala Naresh Kumar Reddy

High Court for the State of Telangana The Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and The Hon'ble Sri Justice A. Abhishek Reddy F.C.A. No. 195 of 2019 Date: 10-01-2020 Between:

Smt. Nandyala Sujatha ...Appellant And Sri Nandyala Naresh Kumar Reddy

...Respondent

Counsel for the appellant:

Mrs. G. Jhansi Counsel for respondent: Mr. Rajeswar Rao The Court made the following:

Judgment: (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan) Both the appellant, namely Smt. Nandyala Sujatha, and the respondent namely Sri Nandyala Naresh Kumar Reddy, are present before this Court. They have submitted their respective Aadhar cards in order to establish their identity. They have also been identified by their respective counsel.

The appellant-wife has challenged the legality of the judgment and decree dated 21-08-2019, in F.C.O.P. No. 236 of 2015, passed by the Judge, Family Court at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District, whereby the learned Family Court has granted divorce in favour of the respondent- husband. During the pendency of the present appeal, the parties have entered into a compromise. The terms of the compromise have been submitted before this Court through IA. No. 1 of 2020. The terms of compromise are as under:

a) The respondents herein had agreed to pay a sum of Rs.18 lakhs towards permanent alimony to the petitioner/appellant and accordingly, had issued Demand Draft No. 007859, drawn on Dhanalaxmi Bank, Rajampeta Branch dated 04-01-2020. The petitioner herein having received the said agrees, that all her claims are settled in full and final.

b) The petitioner herein shall file appropriate applications and shall take necessary steps in getting all the cases filed and pending against the Respondent, both Civil and Criminal, at the earliest.

c) With this settlement both parties agree for grant of divorce by dissolution of marriage dated 25.06.2010, performed at GKSR Kalyana Mandapam, Rajampeta, Kadapa District. d) With this settlement all the claims between the parties are settled in full and final and both parties had no claims of whatsoever in nature either in the past, present or in future either in person or against their respective properties. The learned counsel for the respondent has handed over to the appellant, the Demand Draft for Rs. 18 lakhs in terms of clause (a), reproduced hereinabove.

IA. No. 1 of 2020 is allowed. The memorandum of compromise annexed thereto shall be taken on record. Therefore, the judgment and decree dated 21-08-2019, stands modified to the extent of the compromise entered between the parties.

The Registry is directed to issue the decree strictly in terms of the compromise entered between the parties. The appeal is, hereby, disposed of.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand dismissed as infructuous.

____________________________ (Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ) ____________________ (A. Abhishek Reddy, J) lur