Mudiam Beebhi v. The State Of A.P.,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2880 OF 2015 ORDER:

The petitioners have preferred the present criminal revision case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.,) challenging the cognizance of proceedings in C.C.No.349 of 2014 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Allagadda, on the complaint filed for the offence under Sections 354, 506, 342, 323 read with Section 34 IPC.

Heard and perused the material available on record. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners confined his arguments with regard to dispense with the presence of the petitioners before the Court below. He further prays that liberty may be given to the petitioners to file an application seeking discharge before the Court below. Considering the nature of allegations and also as the question of identity of the petitioners/A.2 and A.5 does not arise, the presence of the petitioners/A.2 and A.5 before the trial Court is dispensed with except on the dates when the trial Court insists for their appearance. Further, the petitioners herein are given liberty to file an application before the Court below seeking discharge and the Court below is directed to proceed in accordance with law. The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions pending in this petition, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 08.12.2015 pln