Alakuntla Rajashekar Rao v. The State Of Telangana And 5 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
''
n *' o,gT: j 3,%1,?i" :,H[ Bl,l"1!o, "
o *o '*''it*Bi,l5,H"r'JXi,f r#.RiyDEcErvBER PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETI toNN S:2 918 ND 23909 0F 201 W,P.No.23918 of 2019 Between:
Alakunila Rajashekar Ra< contracror, ci" n r.i" ztiEi, fil?..f i,:t:,,T,rt?ifl:*,ifl:i,ii_"",;r1#:?jfuS.o";u?:t, AND ...PET|T|oNER l The state of relangana, Rep. by its Principal secretary, IVlunicipal Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. , |Hfli:SffiWarangal Municipar Corporation, Waransat, Rep. by its in g Engineer, G reater wa rangal Municipat corporation, ' Itl"rrt Tr:t''tend
4. The Executive Engineer, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal.
5. The District Collector, Warangal Urban Warangal District.
6. The Chief planning Officer, Warangal Urban District. RESPONDENTS Petition Under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High coirt inr"y o" pr""r"o to issue writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the amounts for the work completed by the petitioner i.e. laying of internal cc Roads in Vijayanagar colony, Beside vegetable IVarket, Kazipet in Division No.53 in prr.uan"'e of "Agreement No.Roc.No.E112357412016 dt.
29-04-2017 is illegal, arbitrary and violative-of article 19 (1)(g) of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly direct the respondents to release the admitted amounts together with interest for the completed entered in the I\/easurement Book lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the admitted bill amount in respect of the work executed by the petitioner i.e, laying of internal CC Roads in Vijayanagar Colony, Beside Vegetable l\,4arket, Kazipet in Division No.53, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
W.P.NO: 23909 OF 2019 Between:
t's*.i::e,:a,T[:,\3:,i1? i'3;i'i['Siii ']flnSX'l'-?i,.;l?:'J: il'ifli'"?iB;'?l1l ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana' Rep by its PrincipJl-,Secretary' Municipal Administration ' D;;;'ffi;;i s"iieia,"iai Buiidinss' Hvderabao'
2. The Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation' Warangal Rep' by its Commissioner'
3.TheSuperintendingEngineer'GreaterWarangalMunicipalCorporation' Warangal.
4.TheExecutiveEngineer,GreaterWarangaltl,4unicipalCorporation,Warangal. 5.TheDistrictCollector,WarangalUrbanWarangalDistrict.
6. The Chief Planning Officer, Warangal Urban District ..RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the Circumstancesstatedintneaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased 1o l;;r; writ order or direction especially one in the Nature of writ of Mandamus au.f uti"g the action of the respondents in not paying the amounts fo-r ^th.e ,work ""rpl"t"O by the petitioner i,e laying of - CC ^Road from H No 25-B-17l2 to E.p.i\o.KAZ eruf OS and opp. Transformer lo 30-2-2311A, Bhavani Nagar, Kazipet in W.f.'fo.gS in pursuance of Agreement No.C.No.3/E3/1954412016 dt.
08-05-2017 is itiegat, aroitriry and violativJ of Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of lndia and corisequently direct the respondents to release the admitted amounts together with interest for the work completed entered in the lvleasurement Book. lA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the admitted bill amount in respect of the work executed by the petitioner i.e. laying of CC Road from H.No.25-B-1712 1o E.P.No.KAZ BNK 05 and opp. Transformer 1o 30-2-2311A, Bhavani Nagar, Kazipet in W.No.35, pending disposal of the main writ petition .
Counsel for the in both Writ Petitions : SRI.CH.RAVINDER Counsel for the Respondent No.1 in both Writ Petitions: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMTNtSTRATTON URBAN DEVELOpMENT (TG) Gounsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 & 6 in both Writ Petitions: M/s. P. LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.s in both Writ Petitions: G.p FOR REVENUE The Court made the following COMMON ORDER
THE HON,BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER RIT T T COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject matter oF these Writ Petitions has become infructuous. 2.
Recording the said submission, the Writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
lYiscellaneous petitions, if dfly, pending in these Writ Petitions shall stand closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/-K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. Two CCs to GP for l\,4uncipal Administration Urban Devlopment, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
2. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana. lourl
3. One CC to SRI.CH.RAVINDER, Advocate [OPUC] 4, One CC to lvl/s. P. LAKSHtUI, Advocate (OPUC)
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare copy + 5A
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212021 il'; s'i4 ,4:
eo lJ I i 2ii22 B 1 FLT i.
',/ n COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.23918 AND 23909 of 2019 DISMISSING THE W.P'S AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS rts