P. Rama Devi v. The State Of Telangana

[ 321e 1 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTETVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO:24716 OF 2023 Between:

P. Rama Devi, Wo. A. Vijendar Reddy, Aged about 51 years, Gazefted. Head Master Gr- ll, ZPHS(G) Shayampet, Shayampet lvlandal, Hanumakonda District.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. Tha Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Warangal.

4. The District Educational Officer, Hanumakonda District ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAI\IUS, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not considering the claim of the petitioner for allowing transfer counseling by taking in to her service with effect from 06. 07. 2018 to till date is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional with a consequential direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for allowing her to participate in the transfer counseling by taking in to consideration of her service with effect from 06. 07.

I transfer counseling by taking in to her length of service with effect from 06- 07. 2018 in the present place of working and award entailment points for the total length of service by disposing of her representation dated 02. 09.2023 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NAYAKAWADI RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: ORDER

:( THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.24716 of 2o23 ORDER:

l,earned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, in view of the interim order of this Court dated 06.09.2023, the respondents have considered the representation of the petitioner dated O2.O9.2O23 and have rejected the same and the petitioner has filed another Writ Petition, v therefore, the present Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is accordingly closed AS infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this.Writ Petition, s stand closed.

SD'. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR AO ASSISTAN T REGI RAR ,/TRUE COPY/'

SECTION O FICER +l',ut'E:fi',*;ffi :T i; :[" [:# ;::;i """n" ^" "

To, 1.

BM GJP 9r

HIGH COURT DATED:1310912023 '"..'.ln'i {-,

ORDER

/, ,^ 17 0$1 2m WP.No.24716 of 2023 .r. ,,1, CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUTCOSTS G@ ffi("