High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/4342/2017dismissed as infructuous

K M Gourish, Ranga Reddy Dist (Now Medchal Dist) v. K M Pratap, Ranga Reddy Dist (Now Medchal Dist) And ANR

2022-03-10A.Venkateshwara Reddy3 pages

rN rHE HrGH couRl{3$JsAsBr#E oF TELANGANA rHuRsDAY' ',lq I'ils RiL?'F'^i+ffi* "rwo rHOusnur PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE A'VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: fi42 OF 2017 Petition under Article 227 ol lheConstitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 07.02.2012 in r'p', rtro''l-as ot zors in lA No 931 0I 2014 in o s No lTB of 2014 on the file of tn" Co"f oitf't" erincipat Junior Civil Judge at tr'4edchal' Between:

' -^ ^^6'1 d6 vears' occ:Social wot\"!'11:

i pa c rc c [ ,s e's^B''i\if {iffiffiqiBt'll':ti-{l')MH'Jffifii,i'n CHttlc, O'tf''oullapur tvtart"o" ' ' ' "- ...pETlTlONER/'LAINTIFF IrYi5l?ji,i;,i,'&; $.i;3 H:l'Hffi ;H""fri'tt$'^??.nt??'i;'oD::i3:;' ""'' *" AND ...RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT B;"S:%HY*:"X:?:J+:l}l"1?:'ff ffi li'l;[ffi "#::f 5[?'"'Hvderabad (Respondent No'2 is not necessary t"*::i::[:ffirro*rr*, Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GADDAM SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent No'1: SRI RESU MAHENDER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No'2: Not necessary party vide C'T' The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY REVISION PETITIONNo.43420F 2077 CIVIL oRpEg:

Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitior_rer and respondents.

It is submittecl that the suit is clismissecl pressed on I2.09.20 I B.

e1s not 3.

Since no cause survives, the Civil Revision Petition is clismissecl as infructuous_ There shall be no order as to costs.

4.Asa sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Civil Revision petition, shall stand ciosed.

SD/.T.KRISHNA KUMAR //TRUE COPY'

ASSISTANT R GISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal Junior Civil Judge, l\,4edchal, Ranga Reddy District.

2. One CC to Sri Gaddam Srinivas, Advocate tOpUCl

3. One CC to Sri Resu lr4ahender Reddy, Advocate tOpUCl

4. Two CD CoPies

5. One SPare CoPY obr v$z

HIGH COURT DATED: 1010312022 FffihN rE' ?t A*BW'E)

ORDER

--- '-^, '-o CRP.No.4342 of 2017 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @'*\, \>\,1$!