Mr.Churaman Singh, v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.Nos.20779 and 20780 of 2018 COMMON ORDER:

The sum and substance of the case of the petitioner in these two writ petitions is that without serving a show-cause notice as contemplated under Sections 452 (1) and 461(1) of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), the respondent Corporation issued the impugned notice under Section 452(2) of the Act.

In the impugned notice, the respondent Corporation referred to the notice issued under Sections 452 (1) and 461(1) of the Ac t and the service of which is disputed by the petitioner in the present writ petitions.

A perusal of the impugned notice discloses in clear terms that by way of impugned notice, the petitioner herein has been called upon to show cause in writing as to why the deviation/ unauthorized portion should not be removed. In stead of submitting explanation to the said notice, the present writ petition came to be filed directly before this Court.

Therefore, leaving it open for the petitioner herein to submit an explanation in response to the impugned notice within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and for consideration of the same by the respondent Corporation and passing of appropriate orders within a period of two weeks thereafter, the writ petitions are disposed of. The respondent

Corporation shall give opportunity to both the petitioner as well as unofficial respondents while passing the orders. Pending suc h exercise, no coercive action shall be taken.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date: 25.09.2018 Note:

Issue C.C. in three days (B/ o) Prv

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.30332 of 2018 24.08.2018 Prv