Lavudiya Lalu v. The State Of Telangana,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.2794 of 2015 BETWEEN Lavudiya Lalu.

... PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical & Health Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. V.V.N. NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MEDICAL, HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE (TG) GP FOR REVENUE (TG) The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Petitioner states that he belongs to ST community and having passed

X class, he has also acquired qualification as X-Ray Technician in 2006. Petitioner states that he has enrolled in the A.P. Para-Medical Board in 2008 and that he has been working as Dark Room Assistant on outsourcing basis at Community Hospital, Khanapur since 2007. Petitioner states that some vacancies of the said post have arisen for which regular appointments are sought to be made and that he has made several representations, the last one being dated 12.01.2015 addressed to respondent No.4 requesting him to either regularize his services or continue his services on contract basis. Alleging inaction on the part of respondent No.4 and that the regular appointments for the said post are under implementation, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare takes notice for respondents 1, 2 and 4 and submits that the contention of the petitioner that regular appointments are sought to be made is incorrect.

3. However, since the representations of the petitioner, as referred to above, are pending with respondent No.4, it is appropriate to direct respondent No.4 to consider the said representations in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two

(2) weeks from date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J February 11, 2015 DSK