A-1 Kethavath Bheemla Nayak v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9811 of 2025 ORAL ORDER:

Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioner-accused No.8 (who arrayed as accused No.1 in remand case dairy) in Crime No.233 of 2025 of Saidabad Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143 (2), 144 (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short, 'BNS') and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (for short, 'PITA'), on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that, on 10.07.2025, the Sub-Inspector of Police, Saidabad Police Station, received credible information that the petitioner was organizing a brothel business. After obtaining authorization to conduct a raid on the said premises, the Investigating Officer raided the scene of the offence and found customers along with the victim. The petitioner, however, was absconding.

3.

Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case against the accused vide Crime No.233 of 2025 for the above said offences.

4.

Heard Sri P. Manoj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent - State. 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence, and that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioner was arrested on 11.07.2025, and that the material part of the investigation has been completed, including the examination of six witnesses and the victim. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner by contending that the allegations against the petitioner were serious in nature and that the investigation is in progress and if the petitioner is released on bail, at this stage, he may tamper with the evidence and may threaten the

witnesses. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it is observed that the petitioner is in jail from 11.07.2025 and as the material part of the investigation is completed and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 A.M., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(3) of BNSS.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 12.08.2025 ss/js

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9811 of 2025 Date: 12.08.2025 ss/js