Samala Kranthi Kumar v. The State Of Telangana
[ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVETUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY wRlT PETITION NO.24849 0F 2023 Between:
Samala Kranthi Kumar, S/o Anantha Ramulu, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Business, F7o. H.No.B-23, Uday Nagar Colony, Amangal, Amangal Town, Rangareddy District ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District.
3. The Station House Officer, Amangal Police Station, Amangal, Ranga Reddy District.
4. Smt. Khajamma, Wo lt/loulana Age 40 years, Occ: Household, R/o.'10-209, Srinivas colony, Amangal Town, Ranga Reddy District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an orders, or issue any directions or issue any appropriate writ more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring action of the 3rdrespondent in not registering the FIR by considering my complaint dt.0810912022 and 1410812023 against the 4th respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, violation of the principles of natural justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under section i51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to forthwith consider my complaint dt.o}to9t2o22 and 1410812023 for registration of FlR, pending disposal of main writ petition in the interest of Justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: - The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.24a49 of 2023 ORDER:
Mr. V. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives and the writ petition has become infructuous. 2.
Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs 3.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition shall stand closed I SD/- N.RAJAGOPAL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR s"/'
SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, One CC to SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA' Advocate IOPUCI for Home, High Court for the State of Telangana at
2. Two CCs to GP Hyderabad [OUT]
3. Two CD CoPies MP GJ t^l<--
HIGH COURT DATED:2111112023 {t\e STAT6 q oo 14 0Ec 2[23 o ,+ * * 1-C
ORDER
WP.No.24849 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS