← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/4719/2017dismissed as infructuous

E. Rajani Babu v. The District Educational Officer

2022-12-15N.V.Shravan Kumar3 pages

[ 3255 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V,SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED NO: 4719 OF 2017 Between:

E. RAJANI BABU, S/o Ganga Ramulu, Aged about 32 Years, Occ: S.G.T., O/o MPPS, Chinnonipally, Gattu Mandal [Transferred to MPPS, Chennaram, Mandal Gopalpet) Mahabubnagar District.

...APPLICANT AND The District Educational Officer, Mahabubnagar, Mahabubnagar District - 509001

2. The Mandal Educational Officer, MP Gattu, Mahabubnagar District - 509 001

3. The Director of School Education, Telangana State at Hyderabad - 500 004.

4. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Telangana Secretariat at Hyderabad - 500 022. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to relieve the applicant from present place as per transfer orders issued in Procs.Rc.No.C1i6B06/2015 dt.30-07-2015 issued by the 1"t respondent to enable him to join at transferred place i.e., MPPS, Chennararn, Gopalpet Mandal, by strictly implementing Rule-15 of transfer rules issued Vide GO Ms No.12 dt.17-6-2015 with all consequential benefits, by holding the action of the respondents in not relieving the applicant from present place as per his transfer orders dt.

30-07-2015 issued by the '1't respondent and relieving the other similarly situated teachers is highly illegal, arbitrary discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of lndia. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH.

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4719 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSTSTAIT REGTSTRAR a)t, SECTION OFFICER To, li/TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRI CH. JAGANNATHA RAO, Advocate tOpUCl

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATTON, Hiqh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies BB BS Bsr

HIGH COURT DATED: 1511212022

ORDER

'{ 'r STAr€ .1 W.P (TR).No.4719 ot 2017 2 3 l[N 2[?:

DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PETTTION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS .Lt k"l sgR