High Court for State of TelanganaSA/1149/2005dismissed no costs
Smt. Kandula Aparanji, v. Rayya China Raju,
2016-08-17M.Satyanarayana Murthy2 pages
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY SECOND APPEAL Nos.1148 & 1149 OF 2005 COMMON JUDGMENT:
In view of the compromise recorded in S.A.No.1151 of 2005, no order need be passed in these appeals since the property involved in these appeals is part and parcel of the property covered by S.A.No.1151 of 2005. Hence, these Second Appeals are dismissed in view of the compromise recorded in S.A.No.1151 of 2005, but without costs.
2. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in these Second Appeals shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Date: 17.8.2016 AMD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
SECOND APPEAL Nos.1148 & 1149 OF 2005 DATE: 17.8.2016 AMD