← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/22816/2017allowed no costs

Tadi Pandu Lianga Reddy v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2017-07-11Raja Elango4 pages

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.22816 of 2017 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed by the petitioners, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to declare the notices, dated 17.06.2017, purported to be issued under Rule 19 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Land Rules, 2003, by the Executive Officer of the 5th respondent in respect to agricultural lands of an extent of Ac.

2.56 cents in S.No.13 of Tallamudunurupadu Village, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the notices, dated 17.06.2017, issued by the Executive Officer of the 5th respondent. 2.

Heard learned counsel for both sides and perused the material available on record. With the consent of learned counsel for both sides, the writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission.

3.

It is the case of the petitioners that Tallamudunurupadu Village was declared as Inam Village under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 and ryots are cultivating lands by the date of declaration and are entitled to Ryotwari Patta under the provisions of the Act and after the death of the great grand fathers of the petitioners respectively, the petitioners are cultivating the subject lands and that the

petitioners are paying Makta to the 5th respondent authorities and land tax to the Revenue authorities. On 17.06.2017, the 5th respondent issued notices to the petitioners demanding to vacate the said lands alleging that the petitioners have not entered into a prior lease with the said authorities and that the petitioners are not paying Maktha for the said lands to the 5th respondent authority and have been continuing in the said lands as encroachers contrary to the Lease Rules, 2003, and if the petitioners would not vacate the said lands, they are entitled to take action in both civil and criminal manner and ultimately it is intimated to the petitioners that if the petitioners are having any grievance with regard to the said notices, then the petitioners are entitled to approach Endowments Tribunal of Peddakakani by way of an appeal.

4.

The main grievance of the petitioners is that in view of the impugned notices, dated 17.06.2017, and consequential auction publication, dated 01.07.2017, the petitioners' right to approach the appropriate appellate authority within reasonable time is taken away and if the said auction is conducted on 11.07.2017 as per the said auction notice, dated 01.07.2017, the petitioners may not have any opportunity of establishing their case before the appellate authority and ultimately petitioners' right of appeal will be infringed and the petitioners may not have any opportunity to establish their case.

5.

On perusal of the record, it is evident that on 17.06.2017, notices were issued by the 5th respondent to the petitioners to show cause the petitioners as to why they should

not be evicted and in the said notices, it is also stated that if the petitioners are having any objections with regard to the notices, then the petitioners are entitled to file an appeal before the Endowments Tribunal at Pedakakani. Having issued the impugned notices, dated 17.06.2017, without giving any opportunity to the petitioners to prefer an appeal before the Endowments Tribunal, Pedakakani, the respondents have issued auction notice on 01.07.2017 with an intention to conduct the auction on 11.07.2017. Hence, the petitioners approached this Court seeking a remedy to set aside the impugned notices, dated 17.06.2017.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that the impugned notices, dated 17.06.2017, are liable to be set aide. 7.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed by setting aside the impugned notices, dated 17.06.2017, issued by the 5th respondent to the petitioners. The petitioners are directed to prefer an appeal before the Endowments Tribunal, Pedakakani, on or before 30.07.2017 against the show cause notices, dated 17.06.2017, issued by the 5th respondent and after filing of an appeal by the petitioners, the respondent authorities are directed to take appropriate action, in accordance with law. ___________________ RAJA ELANGO, J Date: 11th July, 2017 KL

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.22816 of 2017 Date: 11th July, 2017 KL