G. Madhukar, v. The State Of Telangana,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER cRtM|NAL PETTTION NO: 6934_!0E2Q1E Between:

G. Madhukar, Occ. Nil, Fl/o. Residing as paying Guest on ad-hoc basis With faculty providers.

... PETTTTONERyACCUSED(S) AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judlcature at Hyderabad.

2. G. Seetha @ Swetha, Occ. Legal Practitioner, F/o. 13-1-146/3, 2nd Floor, Moti Nagar, Borabanda, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow this quash.petition by setting aside the order Passed by the Honorable Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberbbad in Crl.M.P.No.1461 of 2016 in D.V.C.No.2 of 2010, Honble whereby and where under the Learned Magistrate directed this Petitioner to Pay the arrears amount of Rs 74,000/- Plus the maintenance amounts from the month of September 2015 to April 2016' confirmed by the Honorable lll Additional District Sessions Judge at LB Nagar, R.R District and pass l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased stay the order passed by the Honorable Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad in Crl.M.P.No.1461 ot 2016 in D.V.C No. 2 of 2010, where by and where under the Learned Magistrate directed this Petitioner to Pay the arrears

amount 74,o0ol- Plus the maintenance amounts from the month of September 2015 to April 2016, till the disposal of the criminal Application, confirmed by Honorable lll Additional District and Sessions Judge at LB Nagar, R.R District and pass This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri M. Rathan singh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.6934 0F 2018 ORD ER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this Criminal petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous 2.

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if aly, shall stand closed SD/- K. VENK.AIAH ASSISTANT R GISTRAR //TRUE COPYII sEcTro OFFICER To, The Xl Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad One CC to Sri lvl. Rathan Singh, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad [OPT] Two CD Copies I

I HIGH COURT DATED:0111112023 STATE { lr'E o ?$8 utt i{, f o t?

DESp^ * o i \'-

ORDER

CRLP.No.6934 ot 2018 Dismissing the Criminal petition as infructuous ioL &o