Apex Web Services And Online Education Pvt., Ltd v. Achaini Sri Hari
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERAAAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6945 OF 2022 Between:
Apex Web Services and Online Education P!.t. Ltd., Company incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 Rep by its It/.D.P.Suresh S/o.late R.P.S.Koteswara Rao, Aged about 51 years, R/o.Plot No.766, Defence Colony, Saninikpuri, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERY RESPONDENT NO.2/ COMPLAINANT ;
AND
1. Achaini Sri Hari, S/o.A.Sudarshan, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Business, R:/o.Flat No.303, Sri Krishna Plaza, Palanhali Village, Kattigenahali Village, Jalahobi, Bangalore.
....RespondenU AppellanU Accused
2. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at HYderabad'
...RESP.NDENT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Principal Sessions Judge Court, IVedchal-Malkjagiri District at Malkajgiri to dispose of Crl.A. No.518/2019 expeditiously within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of the order in the interest of justice. LA. NO: 1OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the grounds in Crt.A.No.518/ 20'19 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge Court, Medchal-Malkjagiri District at lt/alkajgiri and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Anand, Advocate rep. Sri P.NAGENDRA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and None appeared for the Respondent No.1 .
The Court made the following: ORDER
i. \ THE HON'BLE DT.JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6945 OF 2022 ORDER:- 1.
Heard the submission of Sri Anand $-ho argued on behalf of Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel on record for the petitioner. Also heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
I \ 2.
Seeking the Court to direct the Court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Medchal, Malkajgiri District, to dispose of I I Crl.A.No.S18 of 2OI9 that is pending on the hle of the said Court expeditiously, the present Criminal Petition is filed. 3.
Petitioner herein is the respondent No.2 to the said appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Criminal Appeai is of the year 2Ol9 and the only request of the petitioner is to direct the Appellate Court to dispose of the said appeal time bound.
1.
The relief sought for appears justifiable. Therefore, this Cou rt considers desirable to allow the Criminal Petition.
5.
Resultantly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. The Court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Medchal, Malkajgiri
Dr.CSI,, Crl.P.No.6945 2022 District, is directed to dispose of the Criminal Appeal No.51B of 2019 that is pending on rhe file of the said Courr, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy ol this order.
6.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand ciosed \ I Sd/-IU-IVANJU DEPUTY REGIST R //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To
1. The Principal Sessions Judge Court, Medchal, Malkajgiri District.
2. Two CCs to the Assistant Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)
3. One CC to Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies
5. One Spare Copy Kj ,N-
HIGH COURT DA\ED:O410812O22
ORDER
CRLP.No.6945 ot 2022 ALLOWING THE CRL.P.
oK