P.V. R.N. Raju v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26018 of 2016 ORDER:

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court reported in J. Ravinder v. APSRTC, Karimnagar Region1.

Heard Sri N. Bhupal Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Telangana Social Welfare Residential Institutions Society, appearing for respondent No.2.

A reading of the above-cited judgment goes to show that lis in the present writ petition is covered by the same. In that view of the matter, following the decision of this Court in J. Ravinder (supra), this writ petition is also allowed in terms thereof.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand disposed of. No order as to costs. __________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 6th SEPTEMBER, 2017.

kvni 1 1994(2) APLJ 26 (SN)