J.Tulasibai v. The District Educational Officer
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEN/BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI wRlT PETITIoN NO.2',|522 0F 2018 Between:
J.Tulasibai, w/o. chandra shekar, aged about 50 years' Language Pandit (Hindi), z P' Hibi'3ir.r".t, Veigoi,lharasangam lr/-andal, SangareddyDistrict' ...pETlTtoNER AND
1. The District Educational Officer, Sangare.ddy., pLOale.ddy District' i. riie oiiiriii Educational officer, Medak, tvldak District' e. rr.l" oii".ior ot scnooirouiaiion, State of Telanoana. Hvderabad.
4. State of Telangana. i;o",;;;H nv its p'ncipil Secri:tary' School Education Department, Sdcretariat, Hyderabad ...
RES'ONDENTS PetitionunderArticle226ollheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of lr,4andamus to declare the action of the respondents in denying the just claim ofthepetitionerforawardingl0entitlementpointstothepetitionerunderspouse category even though the husband of the petitioner is working as Teacher in the sameplace/districtandthatthepetitionerandherhusbandhavenotutilizedthe spousepointsforthe|ast(8)years,therebydefeatingthechanceofthepetitionerfor transferandpostingtonearbyplaceofherhusband'sworkingplaceisasillegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 & 16 of the constitution of lndia besides being contrary to the rule position and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled for transfer f rom the present place by duly awarding 10 additional entitlementpointsunderSpouseCategoryinadditiontohernormalentitlementpoints with all service and monitory benefits.
IAN O: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to award 10 entitlement points to the petitioner under spouse categoryinadditiontohernormalentitlementpointsforthepurposeoftransferfrom the present place pending disposal of the above writ petition'
lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Between:
1. The District Educational Officer, Sangareddy Sqlgareddy District' i. ifre District Educational Officer, Medak, lt/adak District' e. iii; 6i;;;i;iols.r1oofeouiati6n, State or relansana at Hvderabad'
4. The State ot retanganl] R;p. by-iG-Principil Secretdry, School Education Department, Secretaiiat' at Hyderabad.
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND J.Tulasibai, w/o. chandra Shekar, aged about 50 years, Language Pandit (Hindi)' 2eUS, Vetgoi, Jharasangam Mandal, Sangareddy District' .,.PETITIONER Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the cirCumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate theinterimorderdt:25.06,2018inlA.No.1ol2018inW'P.No.21522of2018. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.P.No.2l522 of 2018 ORDER:
When the motter is token up for heoring, leorned Government Pleoder oppeoring for the respondents contended ihoi during pendency of this writ petition the cose of ihe petitioner wos considered ond reiecied vide proceedings doied 26.06.201 B.
Leorned counsel oppeoring for the petitioner hos not dispuled the some.
ln view of the obove, lhis Courl is of the considered view thot the couse in the wril petition does noi survive for odjudicotion. Accordingly, the writ peiition is closed. However, the petitioner is given liberly to chollenge the rejeclion order dqled 26.06.2018 No order os to costs.
Pending miscelloneous petitions, if ony, sholl stond closed. SD/.T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSTSTANT REGIt;rRAR \L'
SECTION OFFICER \ ,TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to Sri D. Bala Kishan Rao, Advocate IOPUC]
2. fwo CCs to GP for School Education, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies.
IVIP I
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212020 TAIg S ( af )(i .J 1 B JAll2021 i:-i ,:
./.
ORDER
WP.No.2f 522 of 2018 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS D1 )P