Md.Ghouse v. Zaheda Begum And The State Of A.P. Rep., By Its Pp

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:799 OF 2012 Criminal Revision Case 397 & 4Ol of Cr.P.C against the Order made in Crl.M.P.No.112 of 2OrO in M.C.No.44 of 1990 dated 18.04-2012 on the file of the Family Court Cum Additional District Court at Mahaboobnagar. Between:

Md.Ghouse, S/o. Dastagiri, Sr.Assistant, D.M. and Head Officer, Mahaboob Nagar' Now at P.H.C. Peddamaddur, Mahaboobnaga ..'ET'T'ONER AND Zaheda Begum Wo. Md.Ghouse, Househoh, R/o- Old Palamoor, Mahaboobnagat'

...RES'.NDENT/..M'LA.NANT The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buitdings, High court of A.P., at Hyderabad ...REspoNDENT/RESpoNDENT CRL.R. C.M.P. NO: '1248OF 2012 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings by recall the order passed by the Lower court on 18.O4.2012 in Crl.M.P.No.1 12 ot 2010 in M.c.No.44 of 1990 on the file of Family Court-Cum-Additional District Court at Mahaboobnagar and suspend the same' Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. MD. AFZAL (not present) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI E.GANESH, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER

i 6\ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.799 OF 2OL2 ORDER:

, I The present Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated lB.O4.2Ol2 in Crl.M.P.No.111l of 2O1O in M.C.No.44 of 199O on the file of Family Court-cum-Additional District Court, Mahaboob Nagar.

2.

There is no representation on behalf of revision petitioner. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is present' 3.

On the last date of hearing, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of revision petitioner, therefore, the matter was directed to be posted to today under the caption for dismissal'. In spite of matter being listed today under the caption for dismissal', there is no representation on behalf of revision petitioner' This shows that the revision petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. Therefore, this Revision is Iiable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.

4.

Accorclingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for non-prosecution

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if arry, shall stand closed.

Sd,- M. MANJULA DE REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Family Court Cum Additional District Court at Mahaboobnagar2. One CC to Sri Md.Afzal , Advocate (OPUC)

3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.(OUT)

4. Two CD Copies Ks/gh I

HIGH COURT DATED:0911212024 zf1. tut ,-.!.1s,-a 1 2 F[i ir]25 ()zo l, * * Dc EO

ORDER

Sjp,:,;Ctl CRL.R.C.No.799 of 2012 Dismissing the Crl.R.C for Non Prosecution.