J.Edukondalu, S/O.Venkateshwara Rao v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP 175 of 2015 Between:

J.Edukondalu, S/o.Venkateshwara rao Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.2515-1/A, G.T.Road, Guntur. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, rep.by its Principal Secretary.

2 The Guntur Municipal Corporation, Guntur, Rep.by its Commissioner.

3 The City Planner, Guntur Municipal Corporation, Guntur. 4 The District Collector, Guntur District, Guntur. 5 The AP Capital Region Development Authority, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, rep.by its Principal Secretary/Chairman. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed here in the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of 2nd and 3rd respondent and their subordinates in trying to demolish a portion of the Residential premises of the petitioner with D.No.25-15-1/A situated at GT Road, Guntur, in pursuance of the Roc.No.1909/2011/G4 dated 26.2.

2014 without following due process of law, notice or opportunity and under the colourable exercise of the power/extraneous considerations and as per their whims and fancies as arbitrary, illegal, against principles of natural justice, Contrary to roders in WP.no.36688 of 2013 dated 14.2.2014 contrary to the interim orders of this Hon`ble Court in WP.no.37048 of 2014 dated 19.12.

The petition coming on for hearing and upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and order of the High Court

dated 07-01-2015 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B.SUDHAKHAR REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner, SRI K.PANDURANGA RAO, Standing Counsel for respondents 2 & 3, GP for Revenue for Respondent No.4 and of GP for Municipal Administration for Respondent Nos.1 & 5, the Court made the following:

ORDER:

Print the name of Sri A. Pandu Ranga Rao, learned standing counsel for respondents 2 and 3. Interim stay granted earlier stands extended for a period of three weeks.

Post after two weeks in the motion list.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 Two CCs to G.P for Municipal Administration Department, (A.P.), High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad (OUT).

2. One CC to SRI B.SUDHAKHAR REDDY, Advocate (OPUC). 3 One Spare Copy.

Tvr

HIGH COURT ARR J

ORDER

NOTE: post after two weeks in motion list DATED: 27-01-2015 WP NO. 175 OF 2015 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED DRAFTED; TVR DATED: 28-01-2015 HIGH COURT ARR J

ORDER

NOTE: post after two weeks in motion list DATED: 27-01-2015 WP NO. 175 OF 2015 INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED