M.Yeshoda, Hyd v. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agriculture University, Hyd And Another
[ 3167 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 1582 OF 2011 Between:
M. Yeshoda, D/o. M. Pandari, Age 24 years, Unemployee Fl/o. Type 2/18, Junior Staff Quarters, Anagaru Campus, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad - 500030. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The Acharya N.G. Ranga Agriculture University, Rep. by its Registrar, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad 30.
2. The Associate Director of Research, Regional Agriculture Research Station, Palem, Mahaboobnagr District, Pin 5092'15, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constjtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in adopting clandestine manner in the selection process for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist in pursuance of notification issued in Advt. No. 2/Services lll Section/2010, dt. 27th September, 20'10 in so far as Zone Vll is concerned as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to proceedings No. 240lOP/88, dl. 27.2.1988, contrary to Notification vide Advt. No. 2/Services lll Section/2O10, dt. 27th September,2010 and also violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of petitioner by duly conducting the recruitment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist as per rules in vogue.
lt2il l.A. NO:4 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 1918 OF 2011) Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents to stay all further process of selection for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist including issuance of appointment orders in pursuance of Notification vide Advt. No. 2/Services lll Section/2010, dt. 27th September, 2010 in so far as Zone Vll is concerned. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VENKATESHWARLU GUMMADAVELLY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T. DURGA REDDY (SC FOR ANGRAU) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1582 of 2011 ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the said submission, this Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this r,r'rit petition, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY// q SD/.K. SREERAMA MURTHY ASSTSTANT REGISTRAR \ SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri Venkateshwarlu Gummadavelly Advocatg [OPUCJ
2. One CC to Sri T. Durga Reddy (SC FOR ANGRAU) IOPUCI
3. Two CD Copies \'>-- CHR SW
HIGH COURT DATED:3010112023
ORDER
SIATs \ a, W.P.No.1582 of 2011 oo 2 3 r',-'q ?'"$ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @ {t\)s