← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/25344/2014disposed of as infructuous

M. Swamy Yadav v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,

2015-01-30A.Rajasheker Reddy3 pages

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P. No. 25344 OF 2014 ORDER :

Mr. Mohd.Islamuddin Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Earnest Money Deposit of Rs.2,00,000/- was forfeited by the respondents and that he filed an application for refund of the same, as such, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this writ petition, shall stand dismissed.

_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 30.01.2015.

KVS

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P.No.25344 OF 2014 Date: 30-01-2015 KVS