← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/42233/2016allowed no costs

Shaik Arif Basha, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

2016-12-05C.Praveen Kumar2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRI T PETI TI ON No.42233 OF 2016 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

2.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed with the following prayer:

"...a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the memo No. 31617/Regn.II/ AI/2012-4 dated 31.08.2015 as illegal, improper, unjust arbitrary and contrary to law and violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the constitution of India and contrary to the provision s of the notaries Act and Rules, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to renew the petitioners certificate of practice without reference to the memo No.31617/Regn.II/A1/20124 dated 31.08.2015." 3.

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by an Order of this Court, dated 02.12.2016, rendered in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and Batch. The same is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

4.

In that view of the matter, following the said order, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the Order dated 02.12.2016 passed in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and Batch.

CPK,J WP_42233_2016 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ JUSTI CE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:05.12.2016 Note:

Registry is directed to attach copy of the order, dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 & Batch to this order.

(B/o) INL