Challa Venkat Reddy And Another v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P.NO.25182 OF 2019

O R D E R

Vide proceedings in Lr.No.11439/TPS/Cir-25/KPZ/GHMC/2019 dated 4.11.2019 issued by the 3rd respondent - Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, represented by Deputy Commissioner, Circle -25, in revoking the building permission granted to the petitioners, the present writ petition is filed. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. Sri Chatla Madhu, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 4, on instructions, submits that respondent No.3 intends to reconsider the issue, since the impugned order was passed without considering the explanation of the petitioners and also no reasons have been given. Since the respondents have realized their mistake and have fairly come forward to reconsider the issue, this court is not inclined to impose any costs, otherwise their act would have entailed imposition of exemplary costs.

As the impugned proceedings have been issued in violation of principles of natural justice, the same is set aside, and the matter is remitted back to the 3rd respondent to reconsider the issue, after considering explanation of the petitioners, and opportunity of hearing is granted to the petitioners. The writ petition is accordingly allowed to the extent indicated above. Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

----------------------------------------- A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J DATE:19-11-2019 avs