← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/10339/2024dismissed as infructuous

Sharjil Khan v. The State Of Telangana

2025-12-31Juvvadi Sridevi3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRTDEVI CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO: 10339 0F 2024 Between:

Sharjil Khan, S/o Shah Mohammed Khan, Age. years, Occ. _ private Job Rl/o H.No. 4-4-120113/1/1 , Sanlaynagar, Aditadad"Dishai . ...PET|T|ONER/ACCUSED No.1 AND 1 II'e. Stgtg of Telanga.na, Rep by its public prosecutor, H(7h Court for the State of Telangana Hyderabad.

2. Fayah Naaz, Wo Sharjil Khan , Age. 50 years, Occ. _ House Wife Fi/o H.No. 4-4-1 2Ol 1 31 1 I 1, Sanjaynagar, Aditabad tiistrici ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAlNANTS Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings relating to cc No.1249 otzoio pending on the file of Judicial First class Magistrate at Adilabad for the offences'punish"able under section 498 (A), 420, s06,323 rpc and sec 3 and 4, 6 of Dp Act'and pass l.A. NO: 2OF 2024 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in cc No.'

1249 of 2o2o p&rding on the file of Judicial First class Magistrate at Adilabad for the offenc". pr"ni"hrblu under Section 498 (A), 420, 506, 323 lpc and sec 3 and 4, 6 of Di, Act Dist pending disposal of the present quash petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing lhe arguments of Sri BALA MURALI Y ,Advocate for the petitioner and Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy Additional Public Prosecutor (TG/AP) on behalf of the RespoMent No.1. and None appeared for the Respondent No. 2.

The Court made the fotlowing: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEL/\ {GANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWAD ]RIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.10339 of2O2, DATED: 31St DECEMBER 2025 Between:

Sharjil Khan . . . Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its public prr secutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad an. I Another ...lespondents ORDER:

When the mafter is taken up for hearing, learr ed Additional Public Prosecutor submits that during the pendency r f the criminal petition to quash the proceedings, the parties have :ompromised the matter and hence, the matter has become infructuc us Recording the aforesaid submission, this crrmlal petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any shall stand closed.

Sd/. U. SUDHA ASS I TANT R //TRUE COPY// . SECTION OFFICER To, I The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Adilabad, The Station House Officer, Women Police Station il bz d District.

bz l, Adilabad District One CC to SRl. BALA MURALI Y Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the I ;tate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT].

Two CD Cooies

HIGH COURT DATED:3111212025 ( oR 1l ,[: S TA ooa I >,z i8 1026 t x S: ITCIJ, --..*....2.

CRLP.No.l0339 ot 2024 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITTON AS INFRUCTUOUS a I Nl,