Mohd. Osman, Secbad v. B.R. Meena And 3 Others
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 33031 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO coNTEMPT CASE NO: 1149 OF 2016 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for his wilful and disobeying/deliberate/violating of the Orders of the High Court dated 1310412016 passed in in W.P.MP.No.15534 of 20'16 in W.P. No.12394 of 2016 Between:
Mohd. Osman, S/o. Late Mr.M.A.Razzak, aged about 55 years, R:/o. H.No.1-19-1 to 3, Guntroop Bazaar, Rasoopura Village, Secunderabad. ...PETITIONER AND
1. B.R. [Vleena, Princrple Secretary, State of Telangana Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. N.B.Vishnu Sagar, The M.R.O. cum Tahsildar, Secunderabad Mandal, Opp. Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.
3. U.Raghu Ram Sarma,, The Rvenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Mandal, Opp. Bharani Complex, [\Iinister Road, Secunderabad.
4. Rahul Boija, The District Collector, Hyderabad District at Nampally, Hyderabad.
5. Haseena Begum,, IvIRO-cum-Tahsildar, Secunderabad Mandal, Opp. Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.
6. K.Chandrakala,, Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Mandal, Opp. Bharani Complex, Minister Road, Secunderabad.
7. Dr.Yogita Rana,, District Collector, Hyderabad District , Nampally, Hyderabad. R5 to R7 impleaded as per the Honorble Court Order dtd.25.01 .2018 in Appl.No.979 ol 2017 in CC No.1 149 of 2016.
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V RAMCHANDER GOUD (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J, SREENTVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1149 of2Ot6 ORDER:
The contempt case is frled seeking to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 1 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 197 | , for deliberate and willful disobedience in implementing the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.15534 of 20 16 in W.P.No.12394 of 2016, dated 13.04.2016.
2.
No representation on behalf of the petitioner in the morning ald afternoon sessions. Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondents.
3.
This Court while admitting the writ petition granted interim order on 13.O4.2016 in W.P.M.P.No.15534 of 2016 in W.P.No.12394 of 2016 directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject land without follorving due process of law.
4.
Respondent No.2 irled counter affidavit, u'herein, it has been speciltca111, stated that subsequent to the interim order, on 22.09.2017 a notice was issued under Section 7 of the A.P.Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for short "thc Act") directing the petitioner to submit explanation. Thereafter, he passed order under Section 6 of the Act vide File No.t)/10124 l2Ol5 dated 05. 10.20 17 and also conducted patrchanama on 09.lO.2Ol7. A copy of the proceeding dated 05.10.20 17 has been enclosed along with the counter affidavit. 5.
In view of the compliance of the order datcd 13.O4.2016 , no further adjudication is required.
6.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closccl . Hon'ever, the petitioner is granted liberty to avail the rctncdics as are available under law, if so advised.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if :ln,v, shall stald closed SD/. M. MANJULA DEPUW REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRl. V RAMCHANDER GOUD' Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana lourl
3. Two CD Copies \ \-jz
HIGH COURT DATED: 2911212023
ORDER
CC.No.1149 of 2016 4It iY\ !
THE CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS 1A