Smt.Ruthala Ramanamma v. The Superintendent Of Police, Visakhapatnam District

W.P.No.26658 of 2009 ORDER:

The writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, with the following prayer:

"To issue a writ or order or direction more action of the 2nd & 3rd respondents in high handedly retaining the vehicle Tata Safari Car bearing No.AP 31AT 3039 of the petitioner without any violation or any case as bad, arbitrary, illegal, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.1&2 to take necessary action against the 3rd respondent for his high handed and illegal action in detaining the said vehicle". It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of the orders of this Court dated 8.12.2009, the respondent authorities have already released the subject vehicle and in view of the same, nothing survives in the writ petition for further adjudication.

On the other hand, it is represented by the learned Government Pleader appearing for Respondents that crime has already registered. In view of the same, the writ petition stands disposed of, keeping it open for the Respondents to proceed with the matter in accordance with law. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date: 30.11.2015 DA

W.P.No.26658 of 2009 30.11.2015 DA W.P.No.26658 of 2009 Between:

Smt.Ruthala Ramanamma ... Petitioner and The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam district and others.

... Respondents

DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 30.11.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers May be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No

3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the Fair copy of the judgment? Yes/No