Amudala Sousheel Goud v. The State Of Telangana

i { HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI CRJMINAL PETITION NOt 7497 OF 2019 Betrveen:

Amudala Sousheel Goud, S/o. Late Sudhakar Goud, Petitioner/Accused No. 1 AND The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., P.S. Bibinagar, Rachakonda District, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

Respondent Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition and the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.l on bail, anested in Crime No. 251 of 2019, of P.S. Bibinagar, Rachakonda Commissionarate;

Counsel for the Petitioner SRI K.VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following;

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G.SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.7497 of 2019 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition, under Section 439 of Cr.P.C,, is filed by the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking to enlarge him on bail in Crime No.251 of 2019 on the file of Bibinagar Police Station, Rachakonda District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 3(t)(sXD of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/accused No.1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondentState and perused the record. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegations against the petitioner do not constitute the offence under Section 3(tXs)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) AcU that the complaint is a concocted !

story; that the allegations made in the complaint are created with an intention to harass the petitioner; that the petitioner is in judicial custody on 01.11.2019; and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Hence, the learned counsel prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the aforesaid case.

4.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. In the present case/ it is to be seen that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and the investigation in the aforesaid crime is

not completed. Hence, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.15,0000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhongir. The petitioner shall not misuse the liberty granted to him.

6.

Subject to the above, the Crimlnal Petition is allowed. 7.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed.

r^-, Kl I sD/- cH. vENKATESHWAR ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 llre Sp_egia] Sessions Judge for SCs/STs (pOA) Act, Nalgonda. .

2. The Addl. Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhongir, Nalgonda District. _

3. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Bhongir, Nalgonda District.

4. The Station House Officer, pS Bibinagar, Rachakonda Commissionerate.

5. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofTelangana, at Hyderabad (OUT)

6. one CC to Sri K.Venumadhav, Advocate (OPUC)

7. one Spare Copy I

1.9.# ftF L HIGH COURT'

GSD,J DATE: 28-11-2019 ORDEII CRL.P. NO. 71\t7 0F2019 BAIL ?$llffiIt