Vanama Srinivasa Rao v. The State Of Telangana,
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.25097 OF 2016 ORDER:
The writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in directing the petitioners not to cultivate the lands covered by survey Nos.4088, 4093/1 to an extent of Acs.1.30 gts., Acs.1.16 gts., 4085/1 to an extent of Acs.5.00 gts., 4085/2 to an extent of Acs.5.00 gts, 4087 joint patta, 4089 to an extent of Acs.2.17 gts and Acs.1.30 gts, 4087 to an extent of Acs.2.17 gts, 4093/3 to an extent of Acs.5.00 gts., 4093/2 to an extent of Acs.4.00 gts, 4101/1 to an extent of Acs.5.00 gts., and 4101 to an extent of Acs.5.00 gts respectively and also declaring the order dated 18.04.2016 in Rc.No.L/507/2016 issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mulugu, directing the third respondent to bindover the first petitioner under Sections 108 to 110 of Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) to maintain good behaviour for such period as the Executive Magistrate deems fit and proper, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to set aside the report submitted under Section 110 CrPC., by the third respondent. Heard and perused the material.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondents 8 to 11 and that the respondents 8 to 11 failed to get order in their favour by the Court below and as such, influenced the respondents 2 to 4 to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondents 8 to 11. Hence, he seeks a direction to the respondents 2 to 4 not to interfere with the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondents 8 to 11. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home (Telangana) submits that the respondents 2 to 4 are not interfering with the affairs of
the petitioners, and more particularly the civil disputes between the petitioners and the respondents 8 to 11.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents 8 to 11 submits that the respondents 8 to 11 are not interfering in any of the affairs of the petitioners and they are not influencing any of the official respondents to interfere with the personal affairs of the petitioners herein. He further submits that the petitioners are cultivating the subject lands till date. Recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home (Telangana) and the learned counsel for the respondents 8 to 11 that they are not interfering with the affairs of the petitioners herein, this Court is of the view that there is nothing to adjudicate in the matter. In spite of their submissions, this Court again directs that the respondents 2 to 4 and the respondents 8 to 11 not to interfere in any of the affairs of the petitioners herein in connection with the subject lands.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any shall also stand disposed of. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 07.11.2016 pln