High Court for State of TelanganaWP/27617/2015disposed of no costs

Baddala Ayyavaraiah S/O. Rosaiah v. State Of Andhra Pradesh

2015-08-28S.V.Bhatt4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY THE TWENTYEIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEEN PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO. 27617 OF 2015 Between:

Baddala Ayyavaraiah & Ors. ... Petitioners V/s.

State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Prl. Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & Ors. ... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Govt.Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following: [order follows]

WRIT PETITION NO. 27617 OF 2015 O R D E R :

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. The petitioners complain against the alleged inaction of fourth respondent in considering the request of the petitioners for assignment of agricultural land in an extent of Ac:2-32 cents and Ac:2-50 cents in survey No.499 of Bommavaram village, Ananthasagaram Mandal, SPSR Nellore district, as contrary to Board Standing Orders, illegal and unconstitutional.

3. As the prayer is one against inaction in considering and disposing of the request of the petitioners, at the outset, it is made clear that this Court is not expressing any view on the entitlement or individual merits of the petitioners herein for grant of assignment of petition land in their favour. It is suffice to direct that the fourth respondent considers the representation dated 11/08/2014 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and passes appropriate orders in accordance with law and as per the entitlement of petitioners. For

any reason, if it appears that the petitioners are not in possession of the land, the same shall also be adverted to while disposing of the representation dated 11/08/2014. If the petitioners fit into the existing assignment policy of the Government, appropriate orders are passed on the representation as directed above.

4. The writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE S.V. BHATT 28/08/2015 I s L

WRIT PETITION NO. 27617 OF 2015 Date:28/08/2015 Circulation No.

Court Master: I s L