Patnam Sayanna, v. Uradi Nadipi Sayanna,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE M.LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO: 375 0F 2002 Appeal Under section 100 of C P'C against the Judgment and Decree dated06.0T.200lmadeinA.S.No.30oflgggonthefileoftheCourtoftheSenior Civil Judge at Narayanapet, Mahabubnagar District Preferred against the JudgmentandDecreeino.S.No.llToflgSgdated30-08-lggTonthefileofthe Court of the District Munsiff (Junior Civil Judge) at Narayanpet' Between:

Patnam Sayanna,, S/o. Yerra Sayanna, Occ- Agriculture' R/o' Thirmalapur Village' Narayanpei Mandal, Mahabubnagar District'

Plantiff/APPellanUAPPellant AND Uradi Nadipi Sayanna,, S/o. Uradi Kanakanna' Occ- Agriculture' R/o' Thirmalapur virLt", ruutryrnpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District' ...DefendanURespondenURespondent Counsel for the APPellant: SRI' K MAHIPATHY, Advocate (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondent : SRI' G' DHARMA RAO' Advocate The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO.375 OF 2OO2 JUDGMENT:

1. On I9.O9.2O23 there w-as no representation from the appellant and the matter is posted to 26.09.2023 under the caption for dismissal. Inspite of the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal and adjourned the matter for two times, today also there is no representation from the appellant. 2.

The appeal pertains to the year 2OO2 and the appellants are not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. 3.

Accordingly, Second Appeal is disrnissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SdI. M. RAMANA KRISHNA JOINT REGISTRAR V SECTION OFFICER \ /TTRUE COPY/'

To,

1. The Senior Civil Judge at Narayanapet' Mahabubnagar District

2. The District Munsiff (Junior Civil Judge) at Narayanpet'

3. One CC to Sri. K. MAHIPATHY RAO' Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to Sri. G. DHARMA RAO' Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD CoPies ttb*

HIGH COURT ML,J DATED:0311012023 1tl6 sI{ Ici ( e oo 0 I JA\ 202[ ), a r+ I OES t,q!

P.i

JUDGMENT

SA.No.375 of 2002 DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.

} il,j $...r >-