High Court for State of TelanganaCRLA/401/2015dismissed

Y. Santhosh Reddy, v. Majjiga Shankar Reddy,

2015-04-29M.S.K.Jaiswal,G.Chandraiah4 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.401 of 2015 JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice G.Chandraiah) This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the son of the deceased Prabhavathi (P.W.3) against the judgment dated 18.09.2012 passed in Sessions Case No.569 of 2008 by the learned X-Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Ranga Reddy District, whereby respondents/A-1 to A-4 were acquitted of the offences under Sections 302 and 201 34 I.P.C. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on either side and perused the material available on record.

Now the question that arises for consideration before this Court is whether the appellant, who is the son of the deceased, can maintain this appeal against the order of a Criminal Court acquitting the accused, in view of the amendment to Section 372 Cr.P.C.?

In the instant case, the incident has taken place on 28.08.2006 and the amendment to Section 372 Cr.P.C. has come into force with effect from 31.12.2009 by virtue of Act 5 of 2009, where the victim can prefer an appeal against acquittal.

Following the judgment of the Apex Court in National Commission for Women V. State of Delhi, a Division Bench of this Court in D.Sudhakar V. Panapu Sreenivasulu, held as follows:

"This issue will not hold us for long, in view of the fact that the apex Court in National Commission for Women V. State of Delhi (supra), has already held that the amendment is not applicable to cases where the incident has taken place prior to amendment. Therefore, even on this count, the appellant fails, and as such, the appeal is liable to be dismissed as not maintainable."

As the incident in the present case happened allegedly on 28.08.2006, no right has accrued to the victim of the deceased to file an appeal against the acquittal of the accused in terms of amended provisions of Section 372 Cr.P.C. and as per its amended provisions, a victim has right to file an appeal against the acquittal of accused after 31.12.2009. Admittedly the incident allegedly happened prior to the amendment of the said provision, no appeal can be maintained by the victim and hence it is liable to be dismissed on that sole ground.

Accordingly the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. ___________________ G.CHANDRAIAH, J ___________________ M.S.K.JAISWAL, J 29.04.2015 Gsn.