← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/9082/2014dismissed as infructuous

Y.Sunil Chand v. The State Of Telangana

2017-03-09A.Shankar Narayana1 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.9082 OF 2014 ORDER:

No representation for the petitioners - accused Nos.1 and 2.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana would represent that on filing of Charge Sheet, the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Khammam, has taken cognizance of the case in C.C.No.374 of 2014 and, therefore, the present petition becomes infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2, of course, seeks time to file counter. But, there is no need to file counter when the present petition rendered infructuous.

4. In view of the representation made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.

___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J March 09, 2017.

MD