← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/2393/2014dismissed as infructuous

Smt.L.Madhu Manjani v. Smt.V.Saritha

2022-09-13Nagesh Bheemapaka3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N/\GESH BHEEMAPAKA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2393 OF 2014 Petition under A rlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, against the Order dated. 03.07.2014 passed in I.A.No.432 ol 2013 in R.C.No. 5 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Principal Rent Controller-cum-XVll Junior Civil Judge, at Secunderabad. Between:

Smt.L.lMadhu Manjani, W/o. Lakshmandas N. tr4anjani, Occ: Business, Shop No.8-1-396, Rashtrapathi Road, Secunderabad.

... Petitio ne r/Res pon d e nURespondent AND Smt. V. Saritha, W/o. V.Srinivas Rao, Occ: Household, Resident of H.No.8-1395, Shivaji Nagar, Secunderabad. ... Res pondenUPetitioner/Petitioner I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRP MP. NO: 3347 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders daled 031O712014, passed in lA.No.432 of 2013 in R.C.No.5 of 2010 on the file of Principal Rent Controller-cum-XVll Junior Civil Judge, at Secunderabad.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMED IMRAN KHAN Counsel for the Respondents: TODUPUNURI KARTIKEYA GOUD The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CTVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 2393 0F 20L4 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

2.

Hence, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

3.

Miscellaneous p etitions, if any, pen in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed.

SDAL.SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //rRUEcoPY// --to t(\\x\} SECTION OFFICER To, 1.

2.

The Principal Rent Controller-cum-XVll Junior Civil Judge, at Secunderabad. One CC to SRl. MOHAMMED IIVRAN KHAN, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRl. TODUPUNURI KARTIKEYA GOUD, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies One Spare Copy IVI\,K\',k 4.

HIGH COURT DATED:1310912022

ORDER

CRP.No.2393 of 2014 r pr& .SI4 |:) 17 frEtwt i!

ll $p.tiClrtO DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS