Ch.Srinivasa Rao v. The State,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Writ Petition No.19557 of 2012 Date: 21-09-2015 Between:

Ch. Srinivasa Rao .... Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, and another .... Respondents HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Writ Petition No.19557 of 2012 ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the consent of the counsel for both parties, the writ petition is disposed of.

2. The present writ petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in insisting the petitioner to vacate the agricultural land to an extent of Ac.1.60 cents out of which Ac.1.00 of land is situated at Machavaram and Ac.0.60 cents of land is situated at Kothapalem of Machavaram Mandal and residential house in an extent of Ac.1.75 cents of land at Machavaram which are ancestral properties of the petitioner without following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land.

3.

On 29-06-2012, this Court while issuing notice before admission directed the respondents not to interfere or otherwise

meddle with the property in question, except by issuing notices under the relevant provision of law. No counter is filed by the respondents disputing the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition.

4.

The only request sought for by the petitioner is that he may be put on notice before initiating any action against him. 5.

Without going into the merits of the case and having regard to the request made by the petitioner, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac.1.60 cents out of which Ac.1.00 of land is situated at Machavaram and Ac.0.60 cents of land is situated at Kothapalem of Machavaram Mandal and residential house in an extent of Ac.1.75 cents of land at Machavaram, without following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

___________________ C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, J Date: 21-09-2015 Ksn