← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/22739/2018disposed of no costs

T. Srinivasulu v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

2018-07-23A.Rajasheker Reddy4 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.22739 of 2018 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in threatening the petitioner for his arrest and calling him to the police station without there being registration of any crime against him.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home produced written instructions stating that respondent No.8 has given complaint to respondent No.3 against the petitioner stating that he is harassing her and not leading matrimonial life. Respondent No.3 has forwarded the same to respondent No.4 for conducting family counselling. Respondent No.5 called the petitioner for family counselling, but he did not turn-up. On that respondent No.5 sent notice under Sections 91 and 160 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner, but he has not responded to the notice. As such, respondent No.5 has deputed respondents 6 and 7 to serve a copy of notice to the petitioner. But the petitioner refused to take the notice and filed the present writ petition.

Since the issue pertains to matrimonial dispute, the respondent-police have to follow the guidelines laid down by the Apex Court in Rajesh Sharma v. State of U.P.,( Crl.A.No.1265 of 2017, dated 27-07-2017 (SLP (Crl.No.2013 of 2017) and also Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar1, if offence is punishable less than seven years.

1 2014 (8) SCALE 250

In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent-police to follow the guidelines laid down by Apex Court in Rajesh Sharma and Arnesh Kumar's cases as stated supra.

Learned counsel for the petitioner says that there is threat to the petitioner from respondents 3 and 5 and her relatives, if that is so, the petitioner can make complaint to the respondentpolice. On receipt of such complaint, the respondent-police are directed to take action in accordance with law. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J 23-07-2018 Nvl