Mohd.Anwar v. The State Of Ap.,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY Crl.P.M.P.No.4663 of 2017 AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.7309 of 2014 COMMON ORDER:

This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/respondent Nos.1 to 8 in DVC No.1 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vikarabad.

2.

Crl.P.M.P.No.4663 of 2017 is filed to permit the second respondent-petitioner in the DVC to compromise the matter with the petitioners.

3.

The petitioners and the second respondent are present. Sri Sujith Jaiswal, learned counsel identified the petitioners. Sri K.Pradeep Reddy, learned counsel identified the second respondent.

4.

The second respondent in the open court submitted that she voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioners at the advice of the elders. She further submitted that nobody compelled or forced her to enter into compromise with the petitioners. 5.

Taking into consideration the factum of settlement arrived at between the parties, this court is of the view that even if the proceedings are allowed to continue, the second respondent may not stick on to her earlier version. No purpose will be served in keeping the matter pending in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principle enunciated in the cases cited supra, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to quash the proceedings. 7.

In the result, Crl.P.M.P.No.4663 of 2017 is ordered. Consequently, the criminal petition is allowed, quashing the proceedings against the petitioners/respondent Nos.1 to 8 in DVC No.1 of 2014 on the file of the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vikarabad. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in the criminal petition, shall stand closed.

__________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J.

June 20, 2017.

YS