R. Narender Reddy And Another v. N. Bhaskar Reddy And Another
[ 3158 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2838 OF 2006 (Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Order and decree made in M.V.O.P.No. 9 of 2004 Dated 17-10-2006 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge - cum - XV Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad) Between:
1. R. Narender Reddy, Sio. R. Malla Redd Sri Laxmi lndustries Rice Mill, Uppal R/o H Uppal Road No. 1, R.R.District, Hyderabad.
2. Smt. R. Latha, W/o. R. Narender Redd R/o H.No.1-49l3iB, Suryanagar Colony, Hyderabad.
Aged 34 yrs Occ: Supervisor o.1 -491318, Suryanagar Colony, v .N v U Aged 20 yrs Occ ppal Road No. 1, Household.
R.R.Diskict, ...APPELLANTS/CLAI MANTS ANO
1. N. Bhaskar Redd, S/o Not Known, Aged: Major Occ: Business No 16-2-7 381E, Asmanghadh, Malakpet, Hyderabad.
2. The National lnsurance Company Limited, Rep. by its Divisional Manager, D.O. lV, Twin Cities Market Complex, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel fortheAppellants: SRI V. ATCHUTA RAM (NOT PRESENT) Gounsel for the Respondents: SRI N. MOHAN KRISHNA The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE G, SRI DEVI M,A.C M.A.No.2838 of 2006 JUDGMENT:"
Atthough the matter perta'ins to 2006 and it was posted under the caption "for dismissat", there is no representation on behaLf of the appettants. Hence, it is presumed that the appettants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingty, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shatl be no order as to costs.
Miscettaneous petitions, if any pending, shat[ stand ctosed. SD/-K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// / \ qlD SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge - cum - XV Additional Chief Judge, Hyderabad (with records if any)
2. One GC to SRI V. ATCHUTA RAM, Advocate TOPUCI
3. One CC to SRI N. MOHAN KRISHNA, Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD Copies
5. One Spare Copy BB q
HIGH COURT DATED: 2910712022 _:\-
JUDGMENT
ri i'-{, r,-, ,\ t, MACMA.No.2838 of 2006 15 ..'.t,,:
'!;
'.1 DISMISSING THE MACMA FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS @7c"etO