G.M.S.Raju v. Sri. B. Narasimha Reddy

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.935 OF 2023 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 01.

27.09.2023 CJ & NVSK, J Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any.

I.A.No.1 OF 2023 Mr. Deepak Bhattacharjee, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. S.Lakshmikanth, learned counsel for the appellants.

Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2023.

For the reasons assigned in I.A.No.1 of 2023, leave is granted.

In the result, I.A.No.1 of 2023 is allowed.

____________ CJ (AAJ) ____________ NVSK, J I.A.No.3 OF 2023 Mr. Deepak Bhattacharjee, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. S.Lakshmikanth, learned counsel for the appellants.

Heard on I.A.No.3 of 2023.

For the reasons assigned in the application, requirement of filing the certified copy of the order dated 20.09.2021 in W.P.No.21658 of 2021 is dispensed with.

In the result, the aforesaid interlocutory

application is allowed.

____________ CJ (AAJ) ____________ NVSK, J I.A.No.2 OF 2023 Mr. Deepak Bhattacharjee, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. S.Lakshmikanth, learned counsel for the appellants.

Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2023.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we find that sufficient cause on condonation of delay of 702 days in preferring the appeal is made out.

In the result, delay in preferring the appeal is condoned and the interlocutory application is allowed.

____________ CJ (AAJ) ____________ NVSK, J WRIT APPEAL No.935 of 2023 Writ Appeal is disposed of.

(Vide Separate Judgment) (B/o.) KL