Muttawali Committee Of Ibadath Khana Hussaini v. Anjuman-E-Alavi, Shia Imamia Athna Ashari Akhbari (Regd)

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.1084 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl.

No.

Date

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 3.

21.11.2024 CJ & JSR,J I.A.No.3 of 2024 Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any.

Mr. Abdul Muqeeth Qureshi, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Md. Abdul Mateen Qureshi, learned counsel for the appellant/review petitioner.

Mr. P.Venu Gopal, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Mir Lukman Ali, learned counsel for the respondent No.1.

Mr.

Ananthula Ravinder, learned Government Pleader for B.C.Welfare, Social Welfare and Minority Welfare Department for the respondent No.2.

Mr. Farhan Azam Khan, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.3.

Heard on I.A.No.3 of 2024, an application seeking review of the judgment dated

11.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.A.No.1084 of 2024.

From a perusal of the aforesaid judgment, it is evident that the aforesaid judgment has been passed on the basis of consent of the parties.

Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant/review petitioner submits that the women members of Shia Akhbari sect are misinterpreting the judgment and have taken a stand that the management of the Ibadat Khana be handed over to them.

In view of the aforesaid submission, learned Senior Counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the respondent No.1 is not claiming the right of management in respect of the Ibadat Khana.

The aforesaid submission is placed on record.

No further orders are required to be passed in this interlocutory application.

The interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of.

_________ CJ (AAJ) _________ JSR,J vs