K.Koteshwar Rao, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad v. The State Of A.P.,Rep.By P.P., High Court Of A.P, Hyd And ANR
BAIL SLIP : The Petitioner/ Accused was directed to be released on bail by the order of the High Court dated'13.12.2010, in Crl.RC.M.P.No'3459 of 2010, in Crl.R.C No.2303 of 2010.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2303 OF 2010 Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the judgment dated 08.12.20 10, in Crl.A.No.190 of 2010, on the file of the Court of the ll Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad by confirming the judgment passed by the XVI Additional Judge -cum- XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
K,KOTESHWAR RAO, VANASTHALIPURAM, HYDERABAD, S/o. K.Basawaraju Proprietor M/s. Laxmi Constructions, Builders and Developers, Rlo.' 5-4-1154, Plot No. 173lA, Sharadanagar, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad - 70 ,..PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 AND THE STATE OF A.P., Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT
2. Chenna [Vlahender, S/o. Ch.Venkatesham, Occ: Employee R/o. H.No. 'l-872614711 , Brindavan Colony, Nallakunta, Hyd., represented by its GPA Holder Chenna Vamshi Krishna, S/o.Ch.Venkatesham, aged about 26 years, Occ: Business, ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT :SRI K. MALLIKARJUN Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent No.1.
: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) : SRI K. HARIHAR BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following : ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.23O3 OF 2OLO ORDER:
This -Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short'Cr.P.C.) by revision petitioner aggrieved by the Judgment dated 08.12.2070 passed in CRL,A.No,19O of 2010 by the learned II Additional :
Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad wherein the Judgmenl of Conviction and Sentence dated 22.06.2O1O passed 1n C.C.No.234 of 2OO9 by the learned XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act, was confirmed.
02. Learned counsel for revision petitioner would submit that the matter has been compromised between the parties
03. Having gone through the record, I do not find any infirmity in concurrent findings recorded by both the Court below. While confirming the conviction, since the case is quasi-criminal in nature, keeping in view the submission made by learned counsel for revision petitioner, the sentence of imprisonment is
reduced to that of the period already undergone by revision petitioner. However, the fine component shall remain unaltered.
04. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is partly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous appliqations, if any, shall stand closed.
sd,- T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY"
SECTION OFFTCER To, ' il'& :""J$,?: IY,l AlSi::U :'"'11?: ;::'- *' o: o''' o n a I c h i er
2. The Court ot rf naOitional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad' ? Two CCs to Public "t"""''
*'nh Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabadlOU ll'
4. One CC to SRI K'MALLIKARJUN' Advocate IOPUC] 5 One CC to SRI K HARIHAR BABU' Advocate [OPUCI
6. Two CD CoPies pcsd/ .a
HIGH COURT I DATED:0310912024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2303 ot 2010 ,zri,;;;
t4 oo I ZAt ((\ 0 3 ;ail -+ .1'^"
r+ t-'l',:r,.:(' 1 PARTLY ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE \