S.Durga Prasad v. K.Padmnabham
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CIVIL REVIS ION PETITIO N NO: 4661 OF 2014 PetitionunderArticle22TofConstitutionoflndia,aggrievedbytheorderdated 18tO7l2o14in lA No.212 0f 2014 in oS No.B77 0f 2013 0n the file of the court of the XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad' Between:
s Duroa Prasad. s/o s.Janardhan Age.49 years, occ: Hotel Business, [vl/s Bhavani 6"'iirilu.'. n.t jo:-s-ioaor+, at Kachisuda Xtoad. EX?;f3;3*rENr/ DEFENDANT AND l.K.Padmnabham,S/olateK.V'Pandharinath,Age:58years,occ:PrivateService, R/o H.No. 4-2-1035, Ramkote, Hyderabad'
z. X.Raieshwari, Wlo raie k.iirihatir, nge:+g years, Occ: House wife' R/o H No 42-1 035, Ramkote, Hyderabad. s k. Rr"irdi;nig,, sl,j iate K V Pandharinath, Age:50 years' occ: Business' - nio H No:-5-1030/4, Kachiguda X Road, Hyderabad 4 K S;.b;;rr, olo late K.VlPandharinath, Age:58 vears' occ: Teacher' nlo'H No g-S-1030/4, Kachiguda X Road, Hyderabad' ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS CRPMP. NO: 6380 0F 2014 Petition under section 151 of cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to stay the operations of order in tA No.2'12 ol zo14 in oS ilo.877 ol 2013 on the file of XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad and pass such other order or orders' For the Petitioner : SRI P.GlRl KRISHNA, Advocate FortheReSpondentNos.lto4:SRIBETHIVENKATESWARLU'Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CIVIT- ttEV]SI()N PETII'ION N().-166 I ()1.- 201+ ORDER:
Learned counsel h.rr thc petitioner u,or_rlcl subntit that llt( .iIrsc ]n tlris ri'r'isior-r cl.r's noI srrr-r'i''r,]irrtlrrr iLrijLrrlicati,n .Lncl tlr,, rcr.ision has be come infructuous In that I'ieu of the matter, recorcling the said submission. thc, Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as inl'ructuons. There shalr bc no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if anv, pending shall stancl d ismissed.
Sd/.K.AMI\,4AJI ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY'
i i SECTION OFFICER To The Chairman, XXV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (with records) One CC to Sri P.G jri Krishna, Advocate (OPUC) One CC to Sri Bethi Venkateshwarlu, Advocate'(OpUC) Two CD Copies 3.
4.
Kj r^\\-
HIGH COURT DATED:31 11212020 1EL.
$ 6.\,/ s"- rle,o {p"
* cti C) ,f ( ,l 3 li
ORDER
CRP.No.4661 of 2014 Dismissing the CRP as infructuous without costs. (a') V....\2'
r\. {rX