K. Pandu v. The State Of Telangana And 3 Others

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD WRIT PETITION No.26127 OF 2019 ORDER:

Heard Sri N.Mukund Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energy appearing for the 1st respondent, Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited, appearing for respondents 2 & 3, and Sri Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for the 4th respondent. 2.

It is stated by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Sri R.Vinod Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 & 3 that the issue in this Writ Petition is covered by the order of this Court, dated 23.03.2018, in W.P.No.9789 of 2018. 3.

Therefore, for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the power supply to the premises of the petitioner subject to the compliance of the terms and conditions and on furnishing an undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the concerned Municipal Corporation within a prescribed period, and if no such occupancy certificate is produced within such period, it is open to the respondents to take appropriate action, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

_________________________ T.AMARNATH GOUD, J Date: 26.11.2019 kvrm