K. Sadhana, v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P. No.22849 of 2018 O R D E R:

Heard counsel for the petitioners, the Government Pleader for Energy appearing for 1st respondent, Sri R.Vinod Reddy, Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 2 to 5. 2.

The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation represented by its Commissioner is suo motu impleaded as a party respondent in the Writ Petition.

3.

It is stated by counsel on either side that the issue in this Writ Petition is covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.32614 of 2015 dt.18.12.2015.

4.

Therefore, for reasons alike, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the respondents to release new service connections to the petitioners on payment of requisite charges by the petitioners within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, which shall be subject to the further directions which may be issued by the State Government of Telangana or the Supreme Court, which is considering the judgment dt.12.09.2012 of Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.20407 of 2008 and batch. No order as to costs.

5.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J 05th July, 2018.

gra