C.Chinna Koteswar Rao v. A.P.Power Generation Corporation Ltd.,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.29034 of 2009 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner complains against the action of the first respondent in not providing any preference/weightage marks to petitioner-contract labour in the notification dated 08.09.2008 issued by first respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.

3. On 31.12.2009, this Court passed the following interim order: "Notice.

There shall be a direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioner dt.07.12.2008 and 18.12.2009 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order."

4. Having regard to the interim order granted on 31.12.2009, no further order is necessary. However, if the representations pursuant to the order dated 31.12.2009 were considered and disposed of and the petitioner is aggrieved thereby, it is needless to observe that the petitioner can work out the remedies in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

____________ S. V. BHATT, J April 18, 2016 DSK