K. Chandraiah v. The Sate Of Telangana

-< HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 26764 OF 2016 Between:

K. Chandraiah, S/o. Peda Hanmaiah Aged; 50 years Occ; Agricuture/Business, R/o. Chilmul Mailwar Vilage, Bomraspet, [tr4ahabubnagar District.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The Sate of Telangana, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Prohibition & Excise Deportment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. Th6 Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, The Government of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

3. Piohibilion & Excise Superintendent, Mahabubnagar District, at Mahabubnagar ..RESP.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in issuing the impugned order dated: O5-O7-2016 vide R.C-No. B-11137012016, by suspending the petitioner toddy shop No. 3 Chilmulmailwar Village, Boramspet Mandal and Mahabubnagar District. as illegal, arbitrary against the Excise rules, against the principles of natural justice and u n-co nstitutional consequently to set aside the impugned order dated: 05-07-2016 vide R.C-No. B-11137012016, of the 3rd respondent.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 33137 0F 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 3rd respondent dated: 05-07-2016 vide R.C.No B11137012016, forthwith pending disposal of writ petition before this Honble court Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.

26764 of2OL6 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication by this Court and thus, the Writ Petition has become infructuous2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismisscd as infructuous. No order as to costs. 3, Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, il any, shall stand closed.

I //TRUE COPY// SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. ()ne CC to SRl. CHALLASRTNIVASA REDDYAdvocate tOpUCl

2. lwo CCs to GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE, Hiqh Court for tile State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies

4. C,ne Spare Copy SDR MMA^t #x

HIGH COURT DATED: 1810412022 I ,,----,, t'

NIt eLQ { t I I --)o ,,j ORT)ER ',!

WP.No.26764 of 2016 DISI\IISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS IIVFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t-.