Section Officers v. A. Santosh Reddy
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1641 0F 2019 contempt case filed Under Sections 10 to 1 2 of contempt of courts Act to punish the respondent herein for willfully violating, disobeying the order of the High Court dated. 07.03.2019 passed in Writ Petition No.284 of 201 9. Between:
Section Officers, Court Officers, Scrutiny Officers, Accounts Officers (Gazetted) Association, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad vide Registered No. 1 73411981 '
represented by its President K. Ivladhavi.
...Petitioner
AND A. Santosh Reddy, Secretary to Government of Telangana, Law (L A and J Courls) Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, Telangana. ... Respondents/R1 Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BI E THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH C}IANDRA STIARMA AND I T] tE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.
coNTEMPT CASE No.1 641 of 2OL9 ORDER: Eer tlTe Hoft ,le the Chief Justice Satish Cho]rLdra Shama) The prese 1t contempt case is arising out of order dated 07.03.2019 pass ed in W.P'No'284 of 2Ol9 by this Court' ThisCour.hasdirectedthecompetentauthoritytotake appropriate acti rn in respect of the recommendations sent by the High Court for grant of higher pay scales to the Members of petitioner's Assc:iation. As the sarne was not done' the present contemPt Petitio r was Preferred'
A detailed reply has been filed in the matter' The reply reveals that the ltate Government has rejected the proposal by an order dated 19.O2.2O27' Meaning thereby' the order passed by this Court has alrea ly been complied with and therefore ' no further orders are requir :d to be passed in the matter' Accordingll , the contempt case is closed with a liberty to the petitioner to file r fresh contempt case in case the petitioner is stil1 aggrieved in the : natter'
Miscellane< us petitions' if any' shall stand closed' There shall be no order as to costs'
SOI-M.RAMANA DEPIJTY R KRISHNA EGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER to'.,.
o. Santosh Reddy Secretary to Governmentof -Telangana' La\^/ (L A and J Courts) Departme' t' E'eJJi'iat Buitoing' Hvderabad Telangara
2. One CC to M/s po 'O''ti'"'ntt*nder'^Advocate [OPUC,]
3. One CC to The no ''tili"'ieol'ota1e Gene'at' (TG)' Advocate [(]PLlCl p
4. Two CD CoPies
5. One SPare CoPY rvlMK bs \-
HIGH COURT DAIED:2911212021
ORDER
CC.No.1641 of 2019 ,g.e srait:\ I \ 1 g ,l!"!2,ti!2 CLOSING THE ( ONTEMPT CASE .\ k