J.Bixam, v. The A.P.S.R.T.C.,

[ 3300 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 24666 OF 2012 Between:

J. Bixam, S/o. J. Venkaiah Aged about 58 years, R/o Kompalty (V&p), Hanumula (tvl) Nalgonda District.

AND ...PET|TIONER

1. The A.P.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Regional Manager, Nalgonda Region, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District

2. The A P.SR.T.C., rep. by its Deputy Chief Traffic Manager, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

3. The A.P.SR.T.C., rep. by its Depot Manager, Nalgonda Depot, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in imposing punishment of deferment of annual increments for a period of 2 years with cumulative affect vide order dated 26.11.2009 and the consequential proceedings dated 06.12.

20'10 of the 2nd respondent as the same is illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to restore the 2 annual increments which were deleted from the petitioners pay and to pay all the consequential benefits which flow consequent to adding of his increments l.A. NO: 'l OF 2012{WPMP. NO: 31481 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent to pass appropriated order in review petition dated 3.1.2012 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.24666 of 2O1 2 ORDER:

I When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.

2.

Recording the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, pending if aly, shal1 stand closed.

SD/. T. JAYA EE ASSISTANT R IS R //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To,1 One CC to SRI G. RAV| MOHAN, Advocate tOpUCl 2 One CC to SRI T. SRINIVAS, SC FOR TSRTC tOpUCl 3 Two CD Copies BN GJP

\ \ HIGH COURT DATED:2510712024 1 HE Sr4 /6.

0 g 0E[ Z0Z{ J a c-'

,,,,

ORDER

D6.9 PaT Ctt19 WP'.No.24666 of 2012 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS t\