Anil Kumar Agarwal v. Canara Bank And 2 Others
[ 3306 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO wRlT PETITION NO: 31'156 OF 2021 Between:
Anil Kumar Agarwal, S/o. Sri. Srinivas Agarwal, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. 3-5-575, Vittalwadi, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad- 500 029. ...PETITIONER AND
1. Canara Bank, Retail asset Hub Hyderabad Represented by its Authorised Officer
2. Canara Bank, Ahmed Nagar Branch Represented by it Branch Manager Ahmed Nagar, Hyderabad.
3. Mr. KVSN Pavan Kumar, S/o KVSN Anjaneyulu, Age 48 years, Occ. Business, R/o 16-1 1-749, Moosaram Bagh, Dilshuknagar, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500036.
.,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondent Bank in demanding to pay the 75 Percent of the balance of bid amount without delivering Physical Possession of the Auction Schedule Property and cancelling the third party Sale registered by Respondent No.3 after the mortgage was created, is illegal, arbitrary and against the provisions of SARFAESI Act. lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay notice dated 18/09/2021 issued by the Respondent Bank to the petitioner to
pay 75 Percent of the bid amount before 30/1 112021 in pursuance of the EAuction sale held on 3010812021 . Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH.SIVA REDDY (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Gourt made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.31156 OF 2O2L ORDER : {Per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Naueen Rao) Even though the matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation from both sides.
2. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No order as to costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. I I //TRUE COPY// SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR GL, SECTION OFFICER To, I 9nu 99 tg Sri CH,Siva Reddy, Advocate [OpUC] Two CD Copies TJ KKS 63K
HIGH COURT DATED:2811212022 1$9 STAT€ I 'il-'l :'. \\ :' !t !,ii sB ttB ?tt}
ORDER
(-) .r' ,.1/ -,1 : r.--^,-l l'
_ -.?'
-:n:'.i;,s WP.No.31156 of 2021 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.
{"I,, "w(