R.Nagi Reddy, v. The Authority-Cum-Labour Officer, Circle-I,
t 3313l HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT APPEAL NO: 1265 OF 2011 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against order dated 23122010 in W.P.No.22 of 2004 on the file of the High Court. Between:
R. Nagi Reddy, S/o. Krishan Reddy, Occ. Commercial Manager Terminated, M/s.Minar Heat Transfer, R/o.Plot No.5, Srikrishna Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT/PETITIONER AND The Authority-cum-Labour Officer, RR.Dist Circle-1, O/o.Commissioner of Labour, Madam Anjaiah Bhavan. R.T.C.'X' Roads, Hyderabad. The Authority-cum-Asst.Commissioner of Labour, Circle-1, Ranga Reddy Diskict, O/o. Commissioner of Labour, Madam Anjaiah Bhavan, R.T.C.'X' Roads, Hyderabad.
M/s.Minar Heat Transfer, rep. by its Managing Director, F-3/B, Phase-l, lDA, Jeedimetla, Ranga Reddy Dt 500055 1.
2.
I ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. k. K. SURI Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondents No.3: SRI.V. HARI HARAN I The Court made the following: ORDER
FION'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI AND IION'BLTi SRI JUSTICE PULLA K,\R'THIK S7.A.No.1265 OF 2011 ILII) CN{E T: (Per IIon'blc SriJusticc Abhinand Kttnar Slt:trii;) \I(ht:n the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the cause in the writ appeal does not survive for adjudication and hence, the writ appeal has become infructuous.
In view of the said submission, the \frit Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall srand closed I , s D/-c H.VEEI tll.rF33',3?HkH J'
SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// I To, Two CCs to GP FOR LABOUR 'High Court for the State of Telangana'at 1.
Hlt"gt li $$i i mv,*mtxxs"gP*u,3t u cr 2.
3.
Two CD copies BM us 99,
HIGH COUR]'
DATED:0910112023 -e STATE o
ORDER
(- -t, tt WA.No.1265 of 2011 r $ ttB TIa ( or) +( I) a ,-?'
DlSMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS x,_l., a\