Sahil Jain v. The State Of Telangana

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI I.A.No.3 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No.7877 of 2019 ORDER:

1) The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 5 in C.C.No.272 of 2016 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, filed this Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in the above C.C. A charge sheet came to be filed against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 506 of I.P.C. and Sections 4 and 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2) During pendency of the Criminal Petition, I.A.No.3 of 2019 came to be filed by the second respondent to record the compromise. Along with the petition, a joint memo which is signed by both the parties and their counsel, photographs of the parties and Photostat copies of their Aadhar Cards came to be filed. It is stated in the affidavit that at the intervention of elders and well wishers, the parties have settled their disputes in terms of the compromise. As per the compromise, both the parties agreed to take divorce and the second respondent has agreed to give no objection in respect of frozen bank locker bearing No.1109 of AMCO bank, Naranpura Branch, Ahmedabad, to whom a letter was issued to freeze the locker vide her letter dated 20.07.2016 and the petitioners find any jewellery of the second respondent in locker the same shall be returned to her. Both the parties have

agreed that the second respondent shall have the permanent custody of the minor son Master Yatharth and the petitioners agreed that they will not claim any visiting rights now or in future. Both the parties have agreed to withdraw the cases filed by them against each other.

3) Today, all the petitioners and second respondent are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel both the parties are present before this Court and they were identified by their respective counsel. This Court, when examined, both the parties have stated that at the instance of the elders, they have settled the matter out of the Court in terms of the compromise. They filed the Terms of Compromise, which do form part of the record. The second respondent has no objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners. 4) In view of the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties, the compromise memo filed by both the parties is recorded and I.A.No.3 of 2019 is ordered.

5) Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed in terms of compromise, and the proceedings in C.C.No.272 of 2016 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioners are hereby quashed.

6) Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. ________________ JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI 24.01.2020 gkv

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI I.A.No.3 of 2019 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7877 of 2019 Dated: 24.01.2020 gkv